Talk Cancer

Question:

Sure, Call Stinesville School and see if a Jan graduated in 1957. I couldn’t believe they had this information.  Not only did Jan get a GED in ‘57 (amazing isn’t it) they also offered that she was the most abusive Hall Monitor in the history of Stinesville High.

Jan was voted least likely to succeed and most likely to become a Health Slut. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -carabelli

Response:

<snip stuff with too many carets to bother with Which committee am I on, Jan? Please answer carefully, because you will be called a LIAR if you are wrong. If you don’t know what commitee you are on, please get help. (the Health Claims and Consumer Protection Advisory Committee)

I am not a member of any committee with that name. A woman who works with Jennie Burke is a member of a committee with a name like that. She must be trying to shut down quackery. Complain to Jennie Burke. Better known as the Anti-Quackery committee. Quackery (in your world) being anything not endorsed by *organized medicine*

Quackery, in my world, being fraudulent "cures" which have no possibility of working and which are designed to steal money from unsuspecting people. Remember that the committee you don’t like was set up as a direct result of a naturopath killing a child. The word Protection is a lie, just like it is on Barrett’s website. If you were protecting the public, you would list the biggest killers, the most needless mistakes, the adverse effect of drugs.

I have paid my VERY OWN money to be a member of an organisation looking at those very things. What patient safety organisations are you a member of, Jan? I didn’t think so. All talk, no action. Instead, organized medicine goes after people like Dr. Kadile, EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS NOT ONE SINGLE PATIENT COMPLAINT.

It is very rare for the victims of murder to complain, yet the police prosecute murderers all the time. Perhaps Alan Yurko should have used the Kadile Defence – the baby didn’t complain. That little tid bit tells us all we need to know. Plus the fact that Barrett and his ilk are NOT qualified to judge. They are heavily biased and not credible.

I believe that Dr Barrett has similar qualifications to Dr Burzynski. Dr Baratz, who you have vilified in this very newsgroup as being an inadequate witness in the Kadile hearing has the degrees of MD, DDS and PhD. I assume you are now agreeing that he is "qualified to judge", or are you selective about whose degrees you accept and whose you don’t? (Rhetorical question.) So where does that leave YOU?????

I do not understand the question. <snip irrelevant material apparently sourced from some anti-amalgam loon I don’t really care *where* he got it. His works stand on thier own. So it wouldn’t matter to you if he got it by sending $10 to someone who offered to print a certificate? I repeat: I don’t really care *where* he got it. His works stand on thier own. <snip diversion of people Peter doesn’t like

So, Jan, you don’t care if he got it out of a corn flakes box. It is a better PhD than that of, say, Dr Baratz. I’m glad we cleared that up. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -From 1970 to 1977, he served as a researcher and assistant professor at the Baylor School of Medicine in Houston, Texas, where his research was sponsored and partially funded by the National Cancer Institute. In May 1977 he founded the Burzynski Clinic in Houston where he has treated over 8,000 patients. He also serves as director of the Burzynski Research Institute, where he continues to pursue scientific research on causes and treatments for cancer. Dr. Burzynski, is the author and co-author of 182 scientific publications and is the recipient of numerous prestigious awards. He currently holds 160 patents in 35 countries for his treatments and inventions, and he has been the subject of many articles and interviews. Only 9 of those 182 "scientific publications" were worth publishing. Prove it. You are famous for lying.

Go to http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search&DB=PubMed Search for ‘burzynski sr" See where it says "Items 1-20 of 38" Look at all the ones where "Burzynski, SR" is listed as author. If he wrote them all it would only be 38, not 182. As it happens, he wrote 9 of them. <snip, sigh, more of the same belittling Other groups have replicated and expanded Dr. Burzynski